← Search

Melissa Beeson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Ridge, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 131W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-10-06 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aprille Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-10-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-03 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Britt Flanagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-09 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica Zseltvay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica Zseltvay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-30 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carter Juergens
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-22 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ai Terui
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Herron/Nutt 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeremy Madrazo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.7% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 55.8% of games
4.0
50%
41W–41L · 50.1% of games
4.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.2% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.5% of games
6.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 46.3% of games
7.5
71.9%
23W–9L · 58% of games
8.5
25%
3W–9L · 37% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
48 matches
#1 Singles
17%
40 matches
#2 Singles
11%
25 matches
#3 Singles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova