← Search

Britt Flanagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 119W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history223 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Joplin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Beeson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-29 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer M Riley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-09-28 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-22 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Terrell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Joplin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-12 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-09 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Terrell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Mattacola
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Joplin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-19 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aprille Black
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberley Cathey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50.7%
38W–37L · 52% of games
4.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.1% of games
6.5
62.5%
25W–15L · 56.2% of games
7.5
44%
22W–28L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
65 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe