← Search

Kathleen Mattacola

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 29W–31L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history60 matches
W
Default
2026-10-14 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melinda Billings
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-07 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kathleen LaMuraglia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-23 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Winstead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-16 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Winstead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jen Strasser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Britt Flanagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tori Swanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melinda Billings
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · Milani 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Swinyer
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · Milani 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Whitley Kemp
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-27 · Milani 18s TriLevel 3.5/3.0/2.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Kemp
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-01 · Milani 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue O'Shaughnessy
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.6% of games
3.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 46.5% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.3% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#2 Female Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams