← Search

Gail Terrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 69W–105L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history174 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heidi Boswell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-07 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-01 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Reeves Rhoten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-29 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-29 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-23 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-22 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Britt Flanagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Britt Flanagan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meghan Hilleboe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-18 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Winstead
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauran Epstein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams67 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
49.3%
33W–34L · 50.7% of games
3.5
26.3%
10W–28L · 39.3% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.3%
15W–38L · 41.3% of games
3.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 64.5% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
23 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams