Search

Christian Buchholz

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
177 matches · 68W–109L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.0
82%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.5
362 of 399
OR · 3.5
680 of 735

Christian is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams90 teams · 2011–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christian has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Christian has gone from the 10th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.5
38.5%
30W–48L · 45.3% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 44.1% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 47.9% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 48.6% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 36.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history177 matches
W
Elia Mavronikolas / Linda Widman
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Wood
+0.044better than expected — took 68% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Judiann Georgevich / Melissa Gujrati
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Forbes Fields
0.025below expectation — took 28% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Lin Story-Bunce / Evelyn Strader
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Price
+0.037better than expected — took 40% of games against 30% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Kelly Albright / Bobbie Westrick
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Lynde-Rhyne
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Kathryn Fleihan / Stephanie Gilmer
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwen Highsmith-Quick
+0.052better than expected — took 47% of games against 33% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Pamela Aikens / Jaime Hendricks
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hilliard
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Lee Varner / Karyn Efird
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Bir
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Janess Reyna / Blythe Murphy
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Bilodeau
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Jen Berlin / Jeanie Reynolds
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Elam
+0.037about as expected — took 25% of games against 20% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Terri Laughlin / Angie Messick
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Wood
+0.083better than expected — took 80% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Laura Gregory / Susan Bjerke
2026-04-12 · Yadkin/Haggard/55+3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Johnson
0.032below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Pamela Hughes / Nan Elizabeth Joyce
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Koeplinger
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.