← Search

Kathryn Fleihan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 61W–99L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history160 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thais Warwar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-01 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Streba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-28 · Kirby 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with silvina piotti
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · Kirby 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Eberhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Bunch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Streba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Kirby 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-06 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mandi Clift
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-24 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Keaney
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Milani 18s TriLevel 3.5/3.0/2.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Herron
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Gay
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bunch
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
36.7%
29W–50L · 46% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 39.3% of games
6.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 50.3% of games
7.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 45.7% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#2 Singles
8%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova