← Search

Deirdre Hjelt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
329 matches · 230W–99L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history329 matches
W
2026-10-08 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elisabeth Kraska
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-05 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Parsons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-10-01 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie McMichael
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-29 · Baker 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Misty Hilliard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-21 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Bettinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-17 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie McMichael
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-09-14 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Bettinger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-10 · Baker 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Garrett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawn McFarlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Baker 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Morrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leigh Abraham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · Dunning 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hjelt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
71.4%
40W–16L · 58.5% of games
3.0
73.6%
53W–19L · 56.8% of games
3.5
52.5%
31W–28L · 50% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
100%
6W–0L · 84.7% of games
5.5
75%
18W–6L · 60% of games
6.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 61.1% of games
7.5
75%
15W–5L · 57.5% of games
3.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.5% of games
3.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.5% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 73.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
86 matches
#1 Singles
8%
27 matches
Singles
4%
13 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams