← Search

Melisa Lyles

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 49W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history89 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Gile
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-30 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Tammy Milani
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-24 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kaye Ferree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-17 · Milani 40s TriLevel 3.5/3.0/2.5W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sammie Jo McCluskey championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-09 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kathleen LaMuraglia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-09-03 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Luisa Cobos
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Causey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · Milani 40s 5.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Sullivan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Curley/Ayers 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Roberts
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Milani 40s TriLevel 3.5/3.0/2.5W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Burick
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Curley/Ayers 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Roberts
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · Curley/Ayers 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Roberts
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
61.9%
13W–8L · 54% of games
3.0
50%
18W–18L · 49.7% of games
5.5
64%
16W–9L · 53.5% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams