← Search

Heidi Gingerich

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 114W–109L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history223 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gail Little
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Egerton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aimee Largen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Gustavsson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-20 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Schwab
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Kasik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vania Robinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Schwab
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · Hilliard 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Hanger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Driscoll 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Hilliard 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Hanger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
54W–18L · 60.7% of games
3.5
23.5%
16W–52L · 39.5% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 37.1% of games
5.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 54.6% of games
6.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 52.4% of games
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 52% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 69% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
50 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches
#3 Singles
6%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova