← Search

Betty Kress

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 39W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Billingsley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-28 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Scott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-21 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynda Guarnieri
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-17 · Vartanian/Mohorn 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney OShea
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-10 · Vartanian/Mohorn 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney OShea
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Mohorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Vartanian/Mohorn 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Mohorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · Vartanian/Mohorn 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Breeding
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kate Augustine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Wielgus
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-03 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Mohorn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Mickleberry
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.8% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 53.5% of games
6.5
77.8%
21W–6L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
2%
1 match
#3 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer