← Search

Ashley Raley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 131W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history217 matches
L
2026-09-28 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Gustavsson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-21 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angela Olalere
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Morrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Robinson/Gingerich 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vania Robinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Core 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Raley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Core 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Raley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Core 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Raley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-30 · Robinson/Gingerich 40s 3.5W Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Fraticelli
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · Robinson/Gingerich 40s 3.5W Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Hu
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · Robinson/Gingerich 40s 3.5W Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Schulenklopper
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-06 · Mohorn/Gingerich 18s 3.5W Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Mohorn
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-23 · Mohorn/Gingerich 18s 3.5W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Callahan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 64.3% of games
3.0
82%
50W–11L · 67.2% of games
3.5
26.1%
12W–34L · 42.5% of games
5.0
100%
5W–0L · 74.7% of games
5.5
61.5%
24W–15L · 57.1% of games
6.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 48.6% of games
3.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 67.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams