← Search

Amy Bunch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Colfax, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 115W–114L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history229 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deb Budler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-30 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiana Pitts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-28 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Burns
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-24 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Dulin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-24 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ginger Ballard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-14 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jen Berlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-03 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Fleihan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Lubeck Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sonia Haslam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Dulin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-17 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sonia Haslam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · Bunch/York 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Gustavsson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.8% of games
3.0
62.8%
49W–29L · 54.8% of games
3.5
34.8%
16W–30L · 39.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 30.5% of games
5.0
100%
5W–0L · 87.1% of games
5.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.8% of games
6.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.5% of games
7.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#2 Singles
7%
15 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer