← Search

Frannie Benfield

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-10-01 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-28 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Mickleberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-14 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elisabeth Kraska
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hilary Holderness
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-20 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michele Alvarino
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-17 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elisabeth Kraska
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-10 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elisabeth Kraska
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Varkey
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-24 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Boswell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Budler 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · Vartanian 3.W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Aphton Lang
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Jones 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Varkey
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 67.8% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.3% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 60.8% of games
6.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 55% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
15%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#3 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal