← Search

Karrah Durham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 121W–68L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history189 matches
W
2026-08-02 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Price
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-30 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Augustine
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Default
2026-07-24 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blythe Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Mohorn
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Jones
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Mohorn
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Snyder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Price
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Berlin
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Snyder
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blythe Murphy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · Williamson 18s TriLevel 4.5/4.0/3.5W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Berlin
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 54.8% of games
3.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.5% of games
3.5
59.7%
37W–25L · 54.3% of games
4.0
40.9%
9W–13L · 42.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
100%
12W–0L · 71.4% of games
6.5
80%
16W–4L · 62.1% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.8% of games
3.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
9%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova