← Search

Samantha Price

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 122W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history202 matches
W
2026-10-19 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-14 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashton Choros
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-13 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yasmina Cassab championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-07 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Rankin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-30 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Augustine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-16 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashton Choros
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-14 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Bodine
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-28 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-27 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Neal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-26 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashton Choros
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-20 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelen Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 57.3% of games
3.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 63.5% of games
3.5
60.5%
26W–17L · 53.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.1% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
75%
6W–2L · 57.9% of games
6.5
56.5%
26W–20L · 54.3% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.1% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 59.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
51 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams