← Search

Emily Wilson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
321 matches · 188W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history321 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-14 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Loftin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-10-12 · Biaggi 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Fresina
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-06 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monica Zseltvay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Swinyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-29 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dionne Holden
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-28 · Dagger/Wilson 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-16 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Loftin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-14 · Biaggi 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-09 · Joplin/Flanagan 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Egerton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-02 · Winstead/Terrell 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Kemp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandye Peterson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.8%
81W–50L · 54.8% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 44.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
34W–17L · 54.3% of games
7.5
52%
26W–24L · 51.6% of games
3.5mixed
64.3%
18W–10L · 58.6% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
10W–12L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
86 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova