← Search

Kathy Chinnis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 134W–163L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history297 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rose Chrismon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-07 · Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allenoush Beard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-06 · Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Gebhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Nadel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gwen Highsmith-Quick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-28 · Redding/White 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Hilliard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-24 · Propst / Nadel 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mariann Van Ryen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-22 · White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Bailey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-16 · Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allenoush Beard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-15 · White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Myra Propst
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-14 · Redding/White 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dana Marpoe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allenoush Beard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.1%
48W–36L · 53.7% of games
4.0
19%
8W–34L · 40.6% of games
6.5
51.8%
44W–41L · 51.1% of games
7.5
44.3%
27W–34L · 47.5% of games
3.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
66 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams