← Search

Alice Procter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 44W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history81 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Andree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-16 · Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah DiNoto
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-02 · Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonita Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonita Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Taylor/Andree 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Andree
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · Pretzsch 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Andree
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-14 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosa Phillips
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · Pretzsch 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Andree
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Stowers
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-30 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlyn Wilson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Pretzsch 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Hinch
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Dagger-Wilson 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Wilson
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 51.2% of games
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova