← Search

Claudia Rodriguez

— year-end
65 matches · 38W–27L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Claudia Rodriguez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lesley Rossato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Baker 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margo Rossato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cathy Soblesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-06 · Baker 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Ballard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-06 · Dean 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christine Hinch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · Holderness / Benfield 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Newkirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veatrice Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Pellerin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-02 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiana Pitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Gingerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Pitts/Rodriguez 40s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veatrice Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Pitts 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel James mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.8% of games
4.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 47.6% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.5
80%
12W–3L · 62.5% of games
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe