← Search

Karen Robinson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
199 matches · 95W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history199 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Tolin championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-28 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patty Craig
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Tolin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-14 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patty Craig
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-04 · Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Toni Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Walsh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Warrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-14 · Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Tolin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Gillenwater
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · Fogleman 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Toni Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-30 · Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Jacoby
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · Warrick 40s 4.0W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Jacoby
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
45.8%
44W–52L · 48.6% of games
4.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 46.8% of games
7.5
55%
33W–27L · 52.1% of games
8.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
44 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe