← Search

Donna Warrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 81W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history169 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynette Paley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-12 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Rosendale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-28 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonnie Satterfield
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-09-28 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Rosendale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-14 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pamela Rosendale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Robinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-06 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Chapman
loading the estimate
2-0
L
2026-06-08 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Cook
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Baker/Guarnieri 18s 4.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Yates
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 4.0W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobbie Westrick
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Barnes
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Womack 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Dymek
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 54.4% of games
4.0
39.5%
30W–46L · 49.2% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 63.5% of games
7.5
50%
24W–24L · 50.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King