← Search

Judy Eaton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 178W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history296 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betty Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-09 · Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynda Pegram
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · Michaels 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsay Profitt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · Berreth/Herron 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ila Rosenthal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-01 · Atchison 65s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Eberhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-09-28 · Atchison 65s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynda Pegram
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-28 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ila Rosenthal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · Hughes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pam McAmis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-09-21 · Chapman/Partagas 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Chapman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Knight mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Knight mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-04 · Berreth/Herron 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marianne Moore
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.3%
64W–34L · 57.8% of games
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.3% of games
6.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 54.1% of games
7.5
57.1%
36W–27L · 51.8% of games
3.5mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
143 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
59 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert