← Search

Linda Lowman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Kernersville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
569 matches · 247W–322L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history569 matches
L
2026-10-07 · Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Beth Hartman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-02 · Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Guglielmo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-01 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-30 · Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Guglielmo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julianne Shamburg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-24 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eva Owens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-19 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Backus championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Varsik championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-16 · Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carla Fox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-10 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eva Owens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-04 · Barnes 55s 7.5W Combo Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Guglielmo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Medina-Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams146 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
25%
3W–9L · 37.4% of games
3.5
52.2%
109W–100L · 49.8% of games
4.0
21.5%
20W–73L · 38.2% of games
6.5
46.1%
35W–41L · 48.8% of games
7.5
44%
48W–61L · 47.7% of games
3.5mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.6% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
38.7%
12W–19L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
256 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
194 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
118 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams