← Search

Amy Backus

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mocksville, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 132W–86L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history218 matches
W
2026-09-26 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Medina-Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-23 · Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Hennessee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-19 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Lowman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-17 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Nicholson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-10 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Britt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Beth Hartman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Yadkin/Haggard/40+6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Hilliard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-28 · Knight/Dee 40s 3.5 Mixed Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Backus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-10 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/40+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Varsik
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Yadkin/Backus-Araujo/40+3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Crews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-07-02 · Yadkin/Hartsough/Timcheck/18+4.0.3.5.3.0 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Linda Lowman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80.4%
37W–9L · 66% of games
3.5
45.6%
36W–43L · 48% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.3% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.6% of games
6.5
69%
29W–13L · 57.5% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 83.3% of games
3.5mixed
50%
11W–11L · 49.5% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams