← Search

Lisa Cook

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 90W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history223 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Wykoff 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Aldridge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-10-09 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Dymek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Riley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-21 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annie Chapman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-04 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Crosier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · Wykoff 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aimee Largen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-31 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Spence
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Judy Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · Wykoff 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alexa Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Huffines
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Dennehy
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-08 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Warrick
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.5% of games
3.5
48.6%
36W–38L · 49.6% of games
4.0
14.6%
6W–35L · 37.8% of games
6.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 52.2% of games
7.5
36.8%
21W–36L · 42.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King