← Search

Cassidy MacKay

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 75W–65L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-13 · Clancy 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-12 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Beth Hartman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-08 · Clancy 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-28 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-21 · Warrick 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Beth Hartman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-17 · Clancy 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-04 · Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · Clancy 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-31 · Tuhro 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-28 · Augustine 3.5W Fall Singles Fri AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-20 · Clancy 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Natalie Harris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.1% of games
3.0
50.9%
28W–27L · 52.3% of games
3.5
24.2%
8W–25L · 36.6% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.7% of games
6.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 62% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#1 Singles
12%
17 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches
#3 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams