← Search

Susan Causey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
High Point, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 26W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history110 matches
W
Ashlea Stanfill / Cassandra Thompson
2026-10-23 · Kuebert 3.0W RnJ Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Lovett
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-10-08 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly Morris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-01 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Molly Morris
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-03 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Evelyn Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melisa Lyles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · Kuebert/Causey 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Whitney Kuebert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · Rusiewicz 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with DEBORAH WELLS
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Rusiewicz 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Ayers
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · Rusiewicz 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with DEBORAH WELLS
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-05 · Rusiewicz 3.5W DAZE Dbls Fri AM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Bradley
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Rosenthal/Smith 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rolandelli
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-03 · Rosenthal/Smith 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Littlejohn
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
34.8%
16W–30L · 47.2% of games
3.5
4.5%
1W–21L · 31.8% of games
5.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.3% of games
6.5
17.9%
5W–23L · 34.2% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer