← Search

Bonnie Satterfield

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 112W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history196 matches
W
2026-10-12 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Kroeger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-07 · Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Kroeger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-06 · Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Shantry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Default
2026-10-01 · Easley 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathy Pace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-28 · Kroeger/Satterfield 55s 7.5W Combo Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Warrick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-09-23 · Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Shantry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-26 · Satterfield/Goodman 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Terri Shantry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-12 · Aikens 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-01 · Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · Aikens 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · Berreth/Herron 55s 3.5W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
10W–0L · 75% of games
4.0
65.3%
49W–26L · 55.3% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 42.3% of games
7.5
59.1%
39W–27L · 54.5% of games
8.5
27.6%
8W–21L · 40.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
48 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal