← Search

Tammy Tao

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 113W–137L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history250 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue O'Shaughnessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-08 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deb Budler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-05 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiana Pitts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charlotte Boone
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue O'Shaughnessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynn Crawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-09-21 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lucy Callahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-17 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Frame
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Boswell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-03 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosemarie Palazzolo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Hanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-24 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lucy Callahan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 59.3% of games
3.0
60.8%
45W–29L · 54.2% of games
3.5
22.8%
13W–44L · 40.8% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 28.8% of games
5.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.5% of games
6.5
40.4%
23W–34L · 48.8% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.4% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 57.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
49 matches
#1 Singles
9%
23 matches
#2 Singles
7%
18 matches
#3 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert