← Search

Deb Budler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 78W–67L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history145 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-05 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Bunch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-04 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Gebhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Adamson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-27 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pam Fabros-Beuchat
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-24 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiana Pitts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · Mavronikolas/Tao 18s 7.5W Combo %hu4w PM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeanie Reynolds
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · Budler 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ginger Ballard
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · Budler 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sloane McPeak
loading the estimate
6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
93.3%
14W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
62.2%
28W–17L · 54.7% of games
3.5
31%
13W–29L · 37.9% of games
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 82.8% of games
5.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.9% of games
6.5
40%
8W–12L · 44.2% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 23% of the time
#3 Doubles
23%
34 matches
#2 Singles
20%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#1 Singles
17%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#3 Singles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer