← Search

Sara Adamson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 80W–44L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-10-05 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sonia Haslam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sonia Haslam
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shatana Knight
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-31 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deb Budler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alexis Ganesh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-21 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiana Pitts
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Augustine 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Augustine 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Jones
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiana Pitts
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Rodriguez/Pitts 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bunch
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Default
2026-05-26 · Augustine 18s 3.5W Singles Tues AM · #3 Singles · 0.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
61.5%
16W–10L · 55.6% of games
3.0
73.7%
28W–10L · 61.4% of games
3.5
50%
11W–11L · 49% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.4% of games
5.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.5% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#1 Singles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
10%
12 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams