← Search

Marie Dunn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 103W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history184 matches
L
2026-10-06 · Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tiffany Feaster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-22 · Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tiffany Feaster
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-15 · Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rhyssa Earley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · Satterfield/Goodman 18s 8.5W Combo Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allenoush Beard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Mavronikolas 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Frank
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Edwards
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · Mavronikolas 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Frank
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariane Cox
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · Mavronikolas 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Frank
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Arfeen 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Syed Arfeen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Goodman 18s TriLevel 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Martin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · Mavronikolas 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Frank
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
64.8%
59W–32L · 55% of games
4.0
30.6%
11W–25L · 38.4% of games
7.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 52.8% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 24.6% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#2 Singles
9%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams