← Search

Shannon Sandifer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 66W–42L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Rankin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Catherine Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janess Reyna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Janess Reyna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Rankin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
Default
2026-07-27 · Davis 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Matthews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Davis 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Janess Reyna
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Davis 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Bir
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Davis 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Rankin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-08 · Davis 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Janess Reyna
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-04 · Davis/Durham 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Davis/Durham 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blythe Murphy
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 59.3% of games
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 47% of games
4.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 44% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 57.7% of games
5.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 61.5% of games
6.5
60%
12W–8L · 51.2% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal