← Search

Catherine Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 97W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history160 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Thais Warwar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-10-08 · Davis 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-01 · Davis 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Thais Warwar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · Davis/Choros 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shannon Sandifer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Default
2026-09-03 · Davis 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Kaplan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Davis 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Foley
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Davis/Choros 18s 3.0W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Dolesh championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-12 · Davis/Choros 18s 3.0W Wed PM · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · Davis 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Charley Lanza
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-27 · Davis 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Charley Lanza
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-20 · Davis 3.0W DAZE Dbls Wed PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Charley Lanza
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · Davis/Choros 18s 3.0W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Dolesh
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
89.3%
25W–3L · 66% of games
3.0
56.2%
27W–21L · 51.5% of games
3.5
31%
9W–20L · 41.1% of games
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
5.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.4% of games
6.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 51.3% of games
3.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.3% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
10 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova