← Search

Jennifer Paloski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 38W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dayna Sheehan championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily White championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-02 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Papson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-28 · TRicks (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kacy Littlehale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-11 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-04 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alyse Fuller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · TRicks (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alyse Fuller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-21 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Umpleby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Spanjers championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · JPaloski (Park Road) Summer sweat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicki Spang
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · JPaloski (Park Road) Summer sweat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dayna Sheehan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · SAbbott/ASpanjers (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Teller
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 74.8% of games
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 68.6% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games
5.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 70.9% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Singles
27%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams