← Search

Dayna Sheehan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan McHugh championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Paloski championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-25 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Cooper
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-18 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-14 · TRicks (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Taylor Ricks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · TRicks (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Taylor Ricks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-24 · TRicks (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Taylor Ricks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-11 · MMcHugh (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-10 · TRicks (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan McHugh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · JPaloski (Park Road) Summer sweat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Paloski
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · JPaloski (Park Road) Summer sweat · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicki Spang
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.4%
27W–17L · 58% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.6% of games
5.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.1% of games
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
19%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal