← Search

Heather Enlow-Novitsky

Matthews, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 90W–60L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Heather Enlow-Novitsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LPratt (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Celeste Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-28 · LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lizette Conover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-24 · LPratt (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lizette Conover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-17 · LPratt (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mallory Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · LPratt (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · MJones (Life Time) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · MJones (Life Time) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
74.5%
41W–14L · 59.9% of games
3.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 50.1% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 41.1% of games
5.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.5% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#1 Singles
26%
39 matches
#2 Singles
20%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe