← Search

Morgan Hoecherl

HUNTERSVILLE, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 39W–68L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Morgan Hoecherl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-08-31 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Case
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · BLeonnig (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Roach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · KEarly (Alexander St Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · KEarly (Alexander St Park) · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · KEarly (Alexander St Park) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-08 · LLMO-Moyer/Jetton · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-01 · LLMO-Moyer/Jetton · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-28 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-24 · LLMO-Moyer/Jetton · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · LKDU - Dugan/Bailey 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cortney Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-07 · BLeonnig (Hornets Nest) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-04-03 · LLMO-Moyer/Jetton · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
37%
27W–46L · 46% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
7.5
50%
12W–12L · 49.8% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
11%
12 matches
#3 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe