← Search

Tara Frame

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 52W–135L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history187 matches
L
2026-10-23 · McClure 3.0W RnJ Dbls Fri AM · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill van Veen
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-10-10 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Dolesh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue O'Shaughnessy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-30 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynn Crawford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-25 · Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gerry Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-24 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Hanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-18 · Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gerry Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-17 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tammy Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · Tao/OShaughnessy 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Tsuei
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-09 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kari Eddington
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-04 · Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill van Veen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-03 · Crawford/Tao 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elia Mavronikolas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
35.4%
17W–31L · 43.3% of games
3.0
25%
10W–30L · 38.2% of games
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 14.3% of games
5.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 61.5% of games
5.5
35%
14W–26L · 44.4% of games
6.5
4.5%
1W–21L · 34.1% of games
3.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.6% of games
6.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
49 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe