← Search

Kelli Young

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oak Ridge, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 40W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history124 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Toni Lewis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Sumner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-25 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tracey Weeks
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-21 · Farley/Shivaji 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mariann Van Ryen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-14 · Farley/Shivaji 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Furr
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Farley/Shivaji 65s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renuka Shivaji
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-24 · Weeks 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Huffines
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-21 · Harris/Womack 55s 7.5W Combo Mon Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paige Yates
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandy Gillenwater
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Sumner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Weeks
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Womack 3.5W DAZE Dbls Mon PM · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Weeks
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.7%
25W–35L · 48.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 29.2% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
27.8%
15W–39L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams