← Search

Betsy Hooper

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burlington, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 122W–63L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history185 matches
L
2026-10-08 · Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Klein
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-05 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawn McFarlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-10-01 · Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelly Glick
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-24 · Emmendorfer 18s 7.5W Combo Thur PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Higgins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-14 · Bettinger/Kraska 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shawn McFarlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · ACC Brooks 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bert Klein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · ACC Brooks 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Muhammad Arida mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-27 · ACC Brooks 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-14 · Bettinger/Kraska 18s 4.0W Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Harris
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Ustach 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Casey Emmendorfer
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-27 · Ustach 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Harrington
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · Clancy 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Harris
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 46.2% of games
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 69.4% of games
3.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 60.9% of games
4.0
31%
9W–20L · 37.8% of games
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.7% of games
6.5
82.9%
29W–6L · 61.5% of games
7.5
50%
12W–12L · 54.3% of games
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert