← Search

Tiana Pitts

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 118W–84L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history202 matches
L
2026-10-13 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Dagger championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-05 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-30 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Bunch
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberley Cathey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-22 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Dagger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-21 · Reynolds/Mohorn 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teri Bramsway
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-24 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deb Budler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-20 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Suki Gutierrez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-18 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberley Cathey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-13 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Suki Gutierrez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Pitts 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Price
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · Bunch/Pitts 18s 6.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alexis Ganesh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
50%
6W–6L · 49.3% of games
3.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 56.5% of games
3.5
38.9%
14W–22L · 43.1% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.2% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 52.6% of games
6.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 56.4% of games
7.5
10%
1W–9L · 41.4% of games
3.0mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
45 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert