← Search

Kathryn Egerton

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
208 matches · 117W–91L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history208 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-12 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Farino
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-10-02 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Catherine Egerton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-4
W
2026-09-29 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-24 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Mickleberry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-23 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Burgio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-21 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffany Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Koehler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-14 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Gingerich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tara Burgio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-28 · Alvarino/Churchill 40s 8.5W Combo Friday AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Janice Henslee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-27 · Jones 18s 7.5W Combo Thurs AM · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Farino
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
12W–3L · 59.5% of games
4.0
56.3%
40W–31L · 53.8% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 44.3% of games
7.5
58%
40W–29L · 53.8% of games
8.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 48.9% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer