← Search

Cathy Soblesky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Reidsville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 120W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history200 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michele Alvarino
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn McFarlin championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-18 · Yadkin/Guglielmo/55+4.5-4.0-3.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shawn McFarlin championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · Smith 40s 8.5W Combo Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kristen Haynes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · Alvarino/Churchill 18s 8.5W Combo Wed AM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Blair Churchill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · Baker 40s 7.5W Combo Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Claudia Rodriguez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-22 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Lindner championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Register championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Register championship
loading the estimate
6-6
W
2026-06-19 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Register championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-19 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Register championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Mcfarlin/Guglielmo 40s 4.0W Fri AM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Lindner championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.4% of games
4.5
58%
51W–37L · 54.6% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
55.9%
38W–30L · 52.7% of games
9.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
49 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova