← Search

Holly Natwick

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 98W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Holly Natwick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-08-24 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna Gay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · RSchuler (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-18 · CKahm/ASherrill (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Varn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · RSchuler (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nadine Neel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · WParker (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Cochran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · DThayaprasat (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
Madelyn Marley / Stephanie Oliver
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Rachael Schuler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Karen Keene / Laurie Bennett
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Kristen Oliver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
Justina Powers / Patricia Smith
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Crysler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · WParker (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Nichols mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Alexander championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Nily Willis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 65.5% of games
4.0
81%
34W–8L · 62.2% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.4% of games
8.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 55.9% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 54.5% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer