← Search

Monica Erb

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
178 matches · 99W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Monica Erb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
W
Krisztina Szukob / Leslie Walker
2026-09-02 · SReynolds (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · SReynolds (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mollie Lynch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · SReynolds (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-05 · SReynolds (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Susan Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · KCochran/MGriffin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · NWillis (Park Road) · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · KCochran/MGriffin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · KCochran/MGriffin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Boger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · LClarke (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-16 · LClarke (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · NWillis (Park Road) · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
L
2026-06-11 · KCochran/MGriffin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kim Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 61.5% of games
4.5
49.3%
37W–38L · 48.4% of games
8.5
40%
16W–24L · 45.5% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#2 Singles
10%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
18 matches
#3 Singles
7%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer