← Search

Diane Bach

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Matthews, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
253 matches · 192W–61L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history253 matches
W
2026-10-09 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Liz Misenheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-02 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Horton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-21 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcus Wege mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Hoben
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Sharp
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · RRanadive/RVoleti (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rohan Ranadive mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · RRanadive/RVoleti (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcus Wege mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-16 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Sharp
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Hiteshew
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · RRanadive/RVoleti (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcus Wege mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75.6%
34W–11L · 66.2% of games
4.0
89.1%
41W–5L · 67.2% of games
4.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 53.7% of games
6.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.9% of games
7.5
93.8%
30W–2L · 69.5% of games
8.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 57.3% of games
4.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
73%
27W–10L · 61.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
44 matches
#1 Singles
9%
23 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe