← Search

Marcus Wege

CHARLOTTE, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 88W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Marcus Wege to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-26 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Bo Torbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Corbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Bret Sprague / Jason King
2026-08-23 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Borcich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Konzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-12 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Andrew Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brent Grayson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · MLohnes (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madison Lohnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · RRanadive/RVoleti (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diane Bach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-08 · MLohnes (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Charlotte Gillum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · RRanadive/RVoleti (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diane Bach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · BAdcock (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Schulz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · MLohnes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bridget Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
4.0
65%
13W–7L · 56% of games
4.5
63%
17W–10L · 56.7% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games
8.5
50%
13W–13L · 50.9% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 73.1% of games
4.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 87.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal