← Search

Andrew Schulz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Matthews, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 70W–71L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history141 matches
W
2026-10-18 · #1 Singles
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-14 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Brett Landau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-06 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Marcus Wege
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-04 · MCTA18/Schmidt/RHTC · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon Adcock championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcus Wege championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Szabo championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · BAdcock/ASchulz (Pine Lake) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Brett Landau
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hien Jimmy Nguyen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-22 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dave Porter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-20 · JClarke/Dukes (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matthew Borcich
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-18 · MWege (Pine Lake) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Batten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
100%
8W–0L · 65.1% of games
4.5
44.3%
27W–34L · 49.9% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
40%
8W–12L · 45.9% of games
9.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 22% of the time
Singles
22%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#1 Singles
15%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer