← Search

Jennifer Bricker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
490 matches · 251W–239L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history490 matches
L
2026-10-12 · Sh.Ingle55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherry Ingle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-05 · TOC.Goulding · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Shelby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · El.Copeland55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dori Mathews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-25 · Ta.Parise18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Davis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-25 · ACP.Fish · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Violaine Romans-Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-21 · Sh.Ingle55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dafnie Driscoll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · NMAC.Efsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Watson championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-18 · NMAC.Efsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Watson championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-18 · NMAC.Efsen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Shelby championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-09-14 · Sh.Ingle55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Corn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · Ta.Parise18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tanya Smith
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · El.Copeland55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Copeland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams113 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
53.5%
76W–66L · 54.5% of games
4.5
36.4%
20W–35L · 45.8% of games
7.5
52.6%
30W–27L · 52.3% of games
8.5
44.5%
57W–71L · 49.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
75.9%
22W–7L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 63% of games
8.0mixed
60.4%
32W–21L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
180 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
168 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
132 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
0%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer